<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using ActionScript without MXML in FlashDevelop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/</link>
	<description>work smarter when building current web trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barklund</title>
		<link>http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/comment-page-1/#comment-93963</link>
		<dc:creator>Barklund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/#comment-93963</guid>
		<description>Well, 3 years ago, AS3 without MXML did not have many followers.

And &quot;customly&quot; has now been fixed ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, 3 years ago, AS3 without MXML did not have many followers.</p>
<p>And &#8220;customly&#8221; has now been fixed ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/comment-page-1/#comment-93934</link>
		<dc:creator>ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/#comment-93934</guid>
		<description>Most people coding in AS3 don&#039;t even KNOW about MXML  Also &#039;customly&#039; is not a word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people coding in AS3 don&#8217;t even KNOW about MXML  Also &#8216;customly&#8217; is not a word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barklund</title>
		<link>http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/comment-page-1/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Barklund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>Well, I did not look further at FlexUnit, but will probably have a look again given your above hints. Thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I did not look further at FlexUnit, but will probably have a look again given your above hints. Thanks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>A friend helped me out.  I should have been using -include-libraries to reference the swc file instead of using -library-path like the documentation, http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/201/html/compilers_123_29.html, says to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend helped me out.  I should have been using -include-libraries to reference the swc file instead of using -library-path like the documentation, <a href="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/201/html/compilers_123_29.html" rel="nofollow">http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/201/html/compilers_123_29.html</a>, says to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barklund.org/blog/2006/12/13/using-actionscript-without-mxml-in-flashdevelop/#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>Morten,

Have you gotten FlexUnit to work with FlashDevelop at all?  I am using an Ant build script to try to build the FlexUnit demo on Darron Schall&#039;s blog, but have been unsuccessful at doing so.  When I run the Ant build script I got from Keith Peter&#039;s blog, it looks like it is compiling successfully, but the swf is not generated.  So instead I ran the compiler from the command line using:

C:\Documents and Settings\Me&gt;mxmlc -sp=&quot;C:/Flex2/flex_2_sdk/frameworks/source/mx
/core&quot; -library-path=&quot;C:/Flex2/flexunit/bin/flexunit.swc&quot; -default-frame-rate=24
 -default-background-color=0xFFFFFF -default-size 550 400 -o=&quot;C:/SVN/AgCg/Action
Script3/Projects/FlexUnitDemo/deploy/ExampleTestRunner.swf&quot; -- &quot;C:/SVN/AgCg/ActionScript3/Projects/FlexUnitDemo/src/ExampleTestRunner.mxml&quot;

and got this:

Error: Can not resolve a multiname reference unambiguously. mx_internal (from C:\Flex2\flex_2_sdk\frameworks\source\mx\core\mx_internal.as) and mx.core:mx_internal
(from C:\Flex2\flexunit\bin\flexunit.swc(mx/core/mx_internal)) are available.

Just wondering if you&#039;d had the same problem.

Alternatively, have you tried using ASUnit?  If you can get that to run, then you wouldn&#039;t have to use mxml at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morten,</p>
<p>Have you gotten FlexUnit to work with FlashDevelop at all?  I am using an Ant build script to try to build the FlexUnit demo on Darron Schall&#8217;s blog, but have been unsuccessful at doing so.  When I run the Ant build script I got from Keith Peter&#8217;s blog, it looks like it is compiling successfully, but the swf is not generated.  So instead I ran the compiler from the command line using:</p>
<p>C:\Documents and Settings\Me&gt;mxmlc -sp=&#8221;C:/Flex2/flex_2_sdk/frameworks/source/mx<br />
/core&#8221; -library-path=&#8221;C:/Flex2/flexunit/bin/flexunit.swc&#8221; -default-frame-rate=24<br />
 -default-background-color=0xFFFFFF -default-size 550 400 -o=&#8221;C:/SVN/AgCg/Action<br />
Script3/Projects/FlexUnitDemo/deploy/ExampleTestRunner.swf&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;C:/SVN/AgCg/ActionScript3/Projects/FlexUnitDemo/src/ExampleTestRunner.mxml&#8221;</p>
<p>and got this:</p>
<p>Error: Can not resolve a multiname reference unambiguously. mx_internal (from C:\Flex2\flex_2_sdk\frameworks\source\mx\core\mx_internal.as) and mx.core:mx_internal<br />
(from C:\Flex2\flexunit\bin\flexunit.swc(mx/core/mx_internal)) are available.</p>
<p>Just wondering if you&#8217;d had the same problem.</p>
<p>Alternatively, have you tried using ASUnit?  If you can get that to run, then you wouldn&#8217;t have to use mxml at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
